From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757730AbXKAV3r (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 17:29:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754498AbXKAV3i (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 17:29:38 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:41530 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751404AbXKAV3g (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 17:29:36 -0400 Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:29:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20071101.142936.114015234.davem@davemloft.net> To: clameter@sgi.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20071101.000118.208338243.davem@davemloft.net> <20071101.021451.217578606.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Christoph Lameter Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 06:03:44 -0700 (PDT) > In order to make it truly dynamic we would have to virtually map the > area. vmap? But that reduces performance. But it would still be faster than the double-indirection we do now, right?