From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Kristian Høgsberg" <krh@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firewire: fw-core: enforce write order when updating fw_device.generation
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 14:53:35 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711011453.35268.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tkrat.66a8b3070e07d80f@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
On Thursday 01 November 2007 12:49, Stefan Richter wrote:
> fw_device.node_id and fw_device.generation are accessed without mutexes.
> We have to ensure that all readers will get to see node_id updates
> before generation updates.
>
Hi, a few points:
- can change it to use spinlocks instead? This would be most
preferable.
- if not, you need comments.
- you also seem to be missing rmb()s now. I see a couple in the
firewire directory, but nothing that seems to be ordering loads
of these particular fields.
- use smp_*mb() if you are just ordering regular cacheable RAM
accesses.
Also, diffstat is a bit wrong... maybe you posted the wrong version?
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
> ---
> drivers/firewire/fw-device.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/firewire/fw-topology.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux/drivers/firewire/fw-device.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/firewire/fw-device.c
> +++ linux/drivers/firewire/fw-device.c
> @@ -808,6 +813,7 @@ void fw_node_event(struct fw_card *card,
>
> device = node->data;
> device->node_id = node->node_id;
> + wmb();
> device->generation = card->generation;
> if (atomic_read(&device->state) == FW_DEVICE_RUNNING) {
> PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK(&device->work, fw_device_update);
> Index: linux/drivers/firewire/fw-topology.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/firewire/fw-topology.c
> +++ linux/drivers/firewire/fw-topology.c
> @@ -518,6 +518,7 @@ fw_core_handle_bus_reset(struct fw_card
> card->bm_retries = 0;
>
> card->node_id = node_id;
> + wmb();
> card->generation = generation;
> card->reset_jiffies = jiffies;
> schedule_delayed_work(&card->work, 0);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-01 5:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-01 1:49 Stefan Richter
2007-11-01 1:50 ` [PATCH] firewire: fw-core: react on bus resets while the config ROM is being fetched Stefan Richter
2007-11-01 1:51 ` [PATCH] firewire: fw-sbp2: enforce read order of device generation and node ID Stefan Richter
2007-11-01 3:53 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-11-01 9:51 ` dealing with barriers (was Re: [PATCH] firewire: fw-core: enforce write order when updating fw_device.generation) Stefan Richter
2007-11-01 11:32 ` Nick Piggin
2008-01-24 0:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] firewire: order of memory accesses (bus generation vs. node ID) Stefan Richter
2008-01-24 0:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] firewire: fw-sbp2: use device generation, not card generation Stefan Richter
2008-01-24 16:04 ` Jarod Wilson
2008-01-24 0:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] firewire: fw-cdev: " Stefan Richter
2008-01-24 16:05 ` Jarod Wilson
2008-01-24 0:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] firewire: enforce access order between generation and node ID Stefan Richter
2008-01-24 4:55 ` Nick Piggin
2008-01-24 16:06 ` Jarod Wilson
2008-01-25 16:35 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-25 17:57 ` Stefan Richter
[not found] ` <59ad55d30801251024j6ff43953tb86aaa52fdea5ec9@mail.gmail.com>
2008-01-25 22:25 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-24 0:55 ` [PATCH 4/4] firewire: fw-core: react on bus resets while the config ROM is being fetched Stefan Richter
2008-01-24 16:11 ` Jarod Wilson
2008-01-24 19:26 ` Jarod Wilson
2008-01-25 16:53 ` [PATCH 4/4 update] " Stefan Richter
2008-01-25 17:16 ` Jarod Wilson
2008-01-25 17:21 ` Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200711011453.35268.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=krh@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®