From: swen@vnet.ibm.com
To: James.Bottomley@steeleye.com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [patch 5/6] zfcp: Fix deadlock when adding invalid LUN
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:37:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071105114627.467128000@vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071105113742.233391000@vnet.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: 805-zfcp-deadlock.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3007 bytes --]
From: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
When adding an invalid LUN, there is a deadlock between the add
via scsi_scan_target and the slave_destroy handler: The handler
waits for the scan to complete, but for an invalid unit,
scsi_scan_target directly calls the slave_destroy handler.
Fix the deadlock by removing the wait in the slave_destroy
handler, it was not necessary anyway.
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c | 2 --
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h | 4 ----
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c | 1 -
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c | 3 ---
4 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
Index: scsi-misc/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c
===================================================================
--- scsi-misc.orig/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c
+++ scsi-misc/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c
@@ -844,8 +844,6 @@ zfcp_unit_enqueue(struct zfcp_port *port
unit->sysfs_device.release = zfcp_sysfs_unit_release;
dev_set_drvdata(&unit->sysfs_device, unit);
- init_waitqueue_head(&unit->scsi_scan_wq);
-
/* mark unit unusable as long as sysfs registration is not complete */
atomic_set_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_REMOVE, &unit->status);
Index: scsi-misc/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h
===================================================================
--- scsi-misc.orig/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h
+++ scsi-misc/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h
@@ -982,10 +982,6 @@ struct zfcp_unit {
struct scsi_device *device; /* scsi device struct pointer */
struct zfcp_erp_action erp_action; /* pending error recovery */
atomic_t erp_counter;
- wait_queue_head_t scsi_scan_wq; /* can be used to wait until
- all scsi_scan_target
- requests have been
- completed. */
};
/* FSF request */
Index: scsi-misc/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c
===================================================================
--- scsi-misc.orig/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c
+++ scsi-misc/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c
@@ -1609,7 +1609,6 @@ static void zfcp_erp_scsi_scan(struct wo
scsi_scan_target(&rport->dev, 0, rport->scsi_target_id,
unit->scsi_lun, 0);
atomic_clear_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_UNIT_SCSI_WORK_PENDING, &unit->status);
- wake_up(&unit->scsi_scan_wq);
zfcp_unit_put(unit);
kfree(p);
}
Index: scsi-misc/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c
===================================================================
--- scsi-misc.orig/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c
+++ scsi-misc/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c
@@ -180,9 +180,6 @@ static void zfcp_scsi_slave_destroy(stru
if (unit) {
zfcp_erp_wait(unit->port->adapter);
- wait_event(unit->scsi_scan_wq,
- atomic_test_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_UNIT_SCSI_WORK_PENDING,
- &unit->status) == 0);
atomic_clear_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_UNIT_REGISTERED, &unit->status);
sdpnt->hostdata = NULL;
unit->device = NULL;
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-05 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-05 11:37 [patch 0/6] zfcp: updates, fixing a variety of oddities swen
2007-11-05 11:37 ` [patch 1/6] zfcp: Remove unnecessary eh_bus_reset_handler callback swen
2007-11-05 11:37 ` [patch 2/6] zfcp: Use also port and adapter to identify unit in messages swen
2007-11-05 11:37 ` [patch 3/6] zfcp: Specify waiting times in ERP in seconds swen
2007-11-05 11:37 ` [patch 4/6] zfcp: Remove SCSI devices when removing complete adapter swen
2007-11-05 11:37 ` swen [this message]
2007-11-05 11:37 ` [patch 6/6] zfcp: Reduce flood on hba trace swen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071105114627.467128000@vnet.ibm.com \
--to=swen@vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome