From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-am33-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Suppress A.OUT library support if !CONFIG_BINFMT_AOUT [try #5]
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 17:05:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071111160504.GR21669@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711111646.27496.ak@suse.de>
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 04:46:26PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > My thoughts go more into the direction that we have hundreds of similar
> > cases where e.g. a VFS function might currently only by used by OCFS2
> > and therefore be dead code for most users, and the only maintainable
> > solution will be to solve these at the compiler and/or linker level.
>
> -ffunction-sections can mostly do it, but only for non modular kernels
>
> One problem is that EXPORT_SYMBOL always creates a reference to the function
> even when nothing uses it.
>
> We would need a weak EXPORT_SYMBOL and some way to check references
> over main kernel and modules. I suppose it could be done as part of modpost
> and then generating a custom linker script that only includes the function
> sections referenced by anybody. But to make this work it would require
> putting all the EXPORT_SYMBOLs into own sections too, but I suppose
> that would be possible.
>
> In the past we had trouble that the explicit linker scripts mentioning every
> function section made the linker very slow, but perhaps that's fixed now.
I don't remember the technical details, but Denys Vlasenko posted some
patches that implemented -ffunction-sections while retaining exports.
Another approach would be calling gcc with "-combine -fwhole-program".
David Woodhouse once sent a whacky patch that implemented this on a
per-module basis retaining exports.
Much harder, but with the biggest possible savings, would be a
CONFIG_MODULES=n kernel built with one gcc call.
>...
> The question is if it would be still have a large enough user base without the
> distribution kernels. If it would be only used by a few users I don't think
> the maintenance overhead would be worth it.
>...
You forget the big embedded userbase - some even stay at kernel 2.4
since kernel 2.6 is much bigger.
> -Andi
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-11 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-09 15:34 [PATCH 0/6] MN10300: Add the MN10300 architecture to Linux kernel " David Howells
2007-11-09 15:34 ` [PATCH 1/6] Suppress A.OUT library support if !CONFIG_BINFMT_AOUT " David Howells
2007-11-11 2:14 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-11 11:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-11 13:59 ` David Howells
2007-11-11 14:22 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-11 15:03 ` David Howells
2007-11-11 15:19 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-11 15:46 ` Andi Kleen
2007-11-11 16:05 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-11-11 16:31 ` David Howells
2007-11-12 15:34 ` David Howells
2007-11-12 19:53 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-12 22:50 ` SL Baur
2007-11-12 23:14 ` David Howells
2007-11-13 3:09 ` SL Baur
2007-11-13 10:57 ` David Howells
2007-11-13 11:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-13 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-13 20:40 ` Matt Mackall
2007-11-13 20:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-12-03 15:15 ` David Howells
2007-12-03 16:00 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-12-03 16:17 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-09 15:34 ` [PATCH 2/6] MTD: Add support for the SST 39VF1601 flash chip " David Howells
2007-11-09 22:34 ` David Woodhouse
2007-11-09 15:34 ` [PATCH 3/6] USB: net2280 can't have a function called show_registers() " David Howells
2007-11-09 15:34 ` [PATCH 4/6] MN10300: Allocate serial port UART IDs for on-chip serial ports " David Howells
2007-11-09 15:35 ` [PATCH 6/6] MN10300: Add MTD flash support for the ASB2303 board " David Howells
2007-11-10 4:05 ` David Woodhouse
2007-11-11 14:01 ` David Howells
[not found] ` <20071109153458.20803.10594.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
2007-11-10 3:53 ` [PATCH 5/6] MN10300: Add the MN10300/AM33 architecture to the kernel " Andrew Morton
2007-11-10 12:18 ` David Howells
2007-11-10 19:43 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-10 20:02 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-12 7:44 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-10 20:09 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-11 14:32 ` David Howells
2007-11-11 14:48 ` David Howells
2007-11-11 15:18 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-11 16:36 ` David Howells
2007-11-11 16:42 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-12 12:19 ` David Howells
2007-11-11 15:07 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071111160504.GR21669@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-am33-list@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®