From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760919AbXKMXqv (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:46:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755899AbXKMXqk (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:46:40 -0500 Received: from smtp103.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.213]:35982 "HELO smtp103.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755779AbXKMXqj (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:46:39 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=c5AFpY38C4PrvCRv2OV4yqA7rlnVI5GbUon65emCkQzUMg6kbXoJWD9csm9KrD/fq89OTVSInemJmqZHyCPE+d7MvxDW5jyrUXejhJPkhQYv0qfm+p5KqPu4QnTw1nQH9AR9Mr2db2Nq6XXy5HIhRhHYmVuU30EI+PCzNeKBju8= ; X-YMail-OSG: Kup0c_cVM1mFkJG28hUm0bORhSDVSSdjDTDMbbVF13VZiGV9Zhpn6tZ1BwbM5bWJ9k2XsEiAFg-- From: Nick Piggin To: Matt Mackall Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:44:17 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Christoph Lameter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200711092336.56172.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <20071112201322.GX17536@waste.org> In-Reply-To: <20071112201322.GX17536@waste.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711132244.17913.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 13 November 2007 07:13, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:36:56PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Just ran some tbench numbers (from dbench-3.04), on a 2 socket, 8 > > core x86 system, with 1 NUMA node per socket. With kernel 2.6.24-rc2, > > comparing slab vs slub allocators. > > Damn your misleading subject! I thought this was going to be about > something interesting. Actually I did test slob as well -- it's competitive with slab and slub up to about 4 cores, which is nice.