From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765158AbXKOA1j (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:27:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757578AbXKOA1Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:27:16 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:57717 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757228AbXKOA1O (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:27:14 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:27:14 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20071114.162714.88176942.davem@davemloft.net> To: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, clameter@sgi.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc2: Network commit causes SLUB performance regression with tbench From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <200711151121.37080.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> References: <20071114114844.GA13927@gondor.apana.org.au> <20071114.154616.46285694.davem@davemloft.net> <200711151121.37080.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Nick Piggin Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:21:36 +1100 > On Thursday 15 November 2007 10:46, David Miller wrote: > > From: Herbert Xu > > Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:48:44 +0800 > > > > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu > > > > Applied and I'll queue it up for -stable too. > > Good result. Thanks, everyone! This case is a good example to use the next time a stupid thread starts up about bug reports not being looked into. To me it's seems clearly more a matter of the quality of the bug report.