From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: x86: disable preemption in delay_tsc()
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:41:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071115194116.12c7a0f6@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711150400.lAF40lIr020160@hera.kernel.org>
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:00:47 GMT
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> wrote:
> Gitweb:
> http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=35d5d08a085c56f153458c3f5d8ce24123617faf
> Commit: 35d5d08a085c56f153458c3f5d8ce24123617faf Parent:
> 7eea436433b7b18045f272562e256976f593f7c0 Author: Andrew Morton
> <akpm@linux-foundation.org> AuthorDate: Wed Nov 14 17:00:41 2007 -0800
> Committer: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org>
> CommitDate: Wed Nov 14 18:45:44 2007 -0800
>
> x86: disable preemption in delay_tsc()
>
> Marin Mitov points out that delay_tsc() can misbehave if it is
> preempted and rescheduled on a different CPU which has a skewed TSC.
> Fix it by disabling preemption.
>
this worries me.. this appears to effectively disable preemption during
udelay() and mdelay() loops... which are very obvious latency inducers.
Now you can argue that if you're preemptible you should have used
msleep() and co, and I'll totally buy that.
Maybe we should just check if we're still on the same cpu or something,
or have a cheap way to pin a process to a cpu.... but both are longer
term solutions.
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
next parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-16 3:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200711150400.lAF40lIr020160@hera.kernel.org>
2007-11-16 3:41 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2007-11-16 3:52 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-16 6:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-16 7:08 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-16 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-16 7:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-16 8:08 ` Avi Kivity
2007-11-16 8:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-16 8:47 ` [patch] x86: make delay_tsc() preemptible again Ingo Molnar
2007-11-16 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-16 10:50 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071115194116.12c7a0f6@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®