mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: the.sator@gmail.com
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jmorris@namei.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/arp.c: Fix arp reply when sender ip 0
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:05:48 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071116.010548.94286711.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cac0ab7d0711160030w149c7a7s2db55ac56d0a05cc@mail.gmail.com>

From: "Jonas Danielsson" <the.sator@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:30:11 +0100

> 2007/11/16, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:
> > From: "Jonas Danielsson" <the.sator@gmail.com>
> > Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:40:13 +0100
> >
> > > Is there a reason that the target hardware address isn't the target
> > > hardware address?
> >
> 
> 
> > Because of this, in cases where a choice can be made Linux will
> > advertise what is most likely to result in successful communication.
> >
> > This is likely why we are changing that target address to the one of
> > the interface actually sending back the reply rather than the zero
> > value you used.
> >
> > In fact I think this information can be useful to the sender of
> > the DAD request.
> >
> 
> There seem to be some confusion about what my patch really does. It
> does not set the hardware address to a zero value.

I knew you were talking about the IP address not the hardware
address.

> The reply from the Linux kernel in computer A, before the patch would look like:
> 
> Reply:
> Opcode: reply (0x0002)
> Sender HW: 00:AA.00:AA:00:AA
> Sender IP:   192.168.0.1
> Target HW:  00:AA:00:AA:00:AA
> Target IP:    192.168.0.1

And this is exactly a sensible response in my opinion.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-16  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-15 11:40 [PATCH] net/ipv4/arp.c: Fix arp reply when sender ip 0 (was: Strange behavior in arp probe reply, bug or feature?) Jonas Danielsson
2007-11-15 15:40 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2007-11-15 21:40   ` Jonas Danielsson
2007-11-15 23:28     ` [PATCH] net/ipv4/arp.c: Fix arp reply when sender ip 0 David Miller
2007-11-16  8:30       ` Jonas Danielsson
2007-11-16  9:05         ` David Miller [this message]
2007-11-16 14:13           ` Benny Amorsen
2007-11-16 19:26           ` Bill Fink
2007-11-17 22:14             ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-11-19 13:06     ` [PATCH] net/ipv4/arp.c: Fix arp reply when sender ip 0 (was: Strange behavior in arp probe reply, bug or feature?) Alexey Kuznetsov
2007-11-20  5:16       ` Bill Fink
2007-11-20  7:49         ` [PATCH] net/ipv4/arp.c: Fix arp reply when sender ip 0 David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071116.010548.94286711.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=the.sator@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome