From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762861AbXKTCQd (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:16:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762033AbXKTCKU (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:10:20 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:36087 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762028AbXKTCKR (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:10:17 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:10:16 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20071119.181016.224103721.davem@davemloft.net> To: clameter@sgi.com Cc: ak@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, travis@sgi.com, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [rfc 00/45] [RFC] CPU ops and a rework of per cpu data handling on x86_64 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20071120011132.143632442@sgi.com> <20071119.175116.55102316.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Christoph Lameter Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:59:33 -0800 (PST) > In that case the generic fallbacks can just provide what you already > have. I understand, I was just letting you know why we probably won't take advantage of this new stuff :-)