From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759790AbXKUKkL (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 05:40:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753641AbXKUKj7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 05:39:59 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:60720 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753927AbXKUKj6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 05:39:58 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:39:51 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Fabio Comolli Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7 Message-ID: <20071121103951.GA5788@elte.hu> References: <20071119151756.GA25446@elte.hu> <20071120204103.GC10008@elte.hu> <20071120215313.GD24156@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7-deb -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Fabio Comolli wrote: > To answer your latest mail, again I don't have numbers but from my > point ov view: > > 23.1 < 23.1+ck < 23.8+cfs.24 > > where 23.1+ck is slightly better than vanilla 23.1 and 23.8+cfs.24 is > much better than 23.1+ck. > > My workload is pretty standard, F8+kde+firefox+kmail+amsn, some kernel > compile and so on. do you remember which particular workload improved the most, and in roughly whatway? (no need for numbers - subjective impressions are accurate enough for this) Ingo