From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>
To: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
kune@deine-taler.de, johannes@sipsolutions.net
Subject: Re: [RFC] Documentation about unaligned memory access
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 14:34:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071124143441.41657307@poseidon.drzeus.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071123001554.12F8B9D4A1F@zog.reactivated.net>
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:15:53 +0000 (GMT)
Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Being spoilt by the luxuries of i386/x86_64 I've never really had a good
> grasp on unaligned memory access problems on other architectures and decided
> it was time to figure it out. As a result I've written this documentation
> which I plan to submit for inclusion as
> Documentation/unaligned_memory_access.txt
>
> Before I do so, any comments on the following?
>
A very nice, and much needed document. I think you should include one thing though:
memcpy() is _only_ safe when one of the pointers is char* or void*. If it is anything more complex than that, gcc will assume alignment and optimise based on that. E.g. memcpy() of two long:s generates the same assembly as doing an assignment.
(Technically it is no different for char* and void*, but since they have byte alignment, gcc can't really do anything creative.)
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-24 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-23 0:15 Daniel Drake
2007-11-23 0:27 ` Avuton Olrich
2007-11-23 1:29 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-23 3:04 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-11-23 6:18 ` dean gaudet
2007-11-23 9:46 ` Arne Georg Gleditsch
2007-11-26 14:50 ` dean gaudet
2007-11-23 1:29 ` David Miller
2007-11-23 10:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-11-23 11:43 ` Heikki Orsila
2007-11-25 11:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-11-25 11:24 ` Heikki Orsila
2007-11-26 0:48 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-26 17:12 ` Ben Dooks
2007-11-27 7:51 ` Kumar Gala
2007-11-23 22:02 ` Vadim Lobanov
2007-11-23 22:52 ` Dmitri Vorobiev
2007-11-24 13:34 ` Pierre Ossman [this message]
2007-11-24 15:50 ` Luciano Rocha
2007-11-24 16:19 ` Pierre Ossman
2007-11-24 17:22 ` Luciano Rocha
2007-11-24 17:35 ` Pierre Ossman
2007-11-24 18:28 ` Luciano Rocha
2007-11-24 17:53 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-11-25 8:27 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-11-25 14:13 ` Olaf Titz
2007-11-26 9:14 ` DM
2007-11-26 14:47 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-27 0:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-11-26 14:51 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-30 8:18 ` Jörn Engel
[not found] <fa.U+CIv4JClOmn6KppLkEOSk7RW0Y@ifi.uio.no>
2007-11-23 1:24 ` Robert Hancock
2007-11-23 2:07 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071124143441.41657307@poseidon.drzeus.cx \
--to=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kune@deine-taler.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®