From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/27] x86: debugctlmsr kconfig
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:06:44 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071126080644.44F3726F8C5@magilla.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Dave Jones's message of Sunday, 25 November 2007 20:57:57 -0500 <20071126015757.GA16807@redhat.com>
> What about the non-Intel vendors ?
> Was this msr present on AMD K6 ? Geode? Winchip? VIA C3 ?
> If not, then this patch isn't complete.
I know modern AMD processors have it. I don't know about any others, nor
off hand where to look to find out. Is there a better way to compose the
"depends on" condition so that it will be true on the modern common
processors and future common flavors, but false on the various ones we
don't know about? (I really just looked around a little and figured that
!X86_F00F_BUG about corresponded to "P6 family".)
Thanks,
Roland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-26 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-25 21:55 [PATCH 01/27] ptrace: arch_has_single_step Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 21:58 ` [PATCH 02/27] x86: segment selector macros Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 21:58 ` [PATCH 03/27] x86: remove TRAP_FLAG Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 21:59 ` [PATCH 04/27] x86: arch_has_single_step Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 21:59 ` [PATCH 05/27] x86: single_step moved Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 21:59 ` [PATCH 06/27] x86: single_step segment macros Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:00 ` [PATCH 07/27] x86: single_step 0xf0 Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:00 ` [PATCH 08/27] x86: single_step: share code Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:00 ` [PATCH 09/27] x86 single_step: TIF_FORCED_TF Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:01 ` [PATCH 10/27] ptrace: generic resume Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-11-25 22:37 ` Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:01 ` [PATCH 11/27] x86-64: ptrace " Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:01 ` [PATCH 12/27] x86-32: " Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:03 ` [PATCH 13/27] powerpc: arch_has_single_step Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:04 ` [PATCH 14/27] powerpc: ptrace generic resume Roland McGrath
2007-12-03 8:12 ` Srinivasa Ds
2007-11-25 22:04 ` [PATCH 15/27] x86-32 ptrace: use task_pt_regs Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:04 ` [PATCH 16/27] x86-64 " Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:04 ` [PATCH 17/27] x86-64 ptrace debugreg cleanup Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:05 ` [PATCH 18/27] x86-64 ia32 " Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:05 ` [PATCH 19/27] x86-32 " Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:05 ` [PATCH 20/27] ptrace: arch_has_block_step Roland McGrath
2007-11-28 23:39 ` David Wilder
2007-11-28 23:58 ` Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:06 ` [PATCH 21/27] ptrace: generic PTRACE_SINGLEBLOCK Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:06 ` [PATCH 22/27] x86: debugctlmsr constants Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:08 ` [PATCH 23/27] x86: debugctlmsr kconfig Roland McGrath
2007-11-26 1:09 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-11-26 7:51 ` Roland McGrath
2007-11-26 22:52 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-11-26 1:57 ` Dave Jones
2007-11-26 8:06 ` Roland McGrath [this message]
2007-11-25 22:08 ` [PATCH 24/27] x86: debugctlmsr context switch Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:08 ` [PATCH 25/27] x86: debugctlmsr arch_has_block_step Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:08 ` [PATCH 26/27] x86: debugctlmsr kprobes Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:08 ` [PATCH 27/27] x86: PTRACE_SINGLEBLOCK Roland McGrath
2007-11-25 22:22 ` [PATCH 01/27] ptrace: arch_has_single_step Christoph Hellwig
2007-11-25 22:59 ` Roland McGrath
2007-11-27 8:53 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-27 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-27 23:05 ` Roland McGrath
2007-11-27 23:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-28 0:08 ` Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071126080644.44F3726F8C5@magilla.localdomain \
--to=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®