From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
Cc: bdupree@techfinesse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Dynticks Causing High Context Switch Rate in ksoftirqd
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:38:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071126213847.4768b1f2@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <474B9EC1.5020304@shaw.ca>
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:36:17 -0600
Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca> wrote:
> bdupree@techfinesse.com wrote:
> > Question: Why is ksoftirqd eating about 5 to 10 percent of my CPU
> > on an idle system? The problem occurs if I config the kernel with
> > tickless support (i.e. CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y). (Thanks to
> > "oprofile" for putting me onto this.)
> >
> > I have noted this same problem on kernel versions: 2.6.23.1,
> > 2.6.23.8 and 2.6.23.9
> >
> > **************************************************************************
> > *** Output from "vmstat -n 1 10" -- Note very high context switch
> > rate *** *** This is on a idle
> > machine! ***
> > **************************************************************************
> >
> > procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system--
> > ----cpu----
> > r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs
> > us sy id wa
> > 0 0 0 1925556 4768 116104 0 0 124 2 6
> > 7538 1 2 96 1
> > 0 0 0 1925556 4768 116104 0 0 0 0 2
> > 147329 0 1 99 0
>
> What did oprofile show? It should be able to narrow down what
> function(s) are responsible for the CPU usage..
>
or better, what does powertop version 1.9 show?
that tends to show tickless wakeup artifacts quite nicely
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-27 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.c70Wy8WHP3DOaDydQ2D94+Xxx/8@ifi.uio.no>
2007-11-27 4:36 ` Robert Hancock
2007-11-27 5:38 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
[not found] ` <1887.192.128.167.68.1196188273.squirrel@www.techfinesse.net>
2007-11-28 0:18 ` Robert Hancock
2007-11-28 5:28 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-29 2:44 bdupree
2007-11-29 15:40 ` Ray Lee
[not found] ` <17931.144.160.98.31.1196356276.squirrel@www.techfinesse.net>
2007-11-29 17:38 ` Ray Lee
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-27 2:36 bdupree
2007-11-28 5:22 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-28 11:20 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071126213847.4768b1f2@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=bdupree@techfinesse.com \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®