From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Andrew Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc3-mm2 - add-64-bit-capability-support-to-the-kernel
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:03:08 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071203150308.GD9008@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14896.1196497105@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Quoting Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu):
> Question:
>
> The patch does the semantic equivalent of:
>
> -#define cap_clear(c) do { cap_t(c) = 0; } while(0)
> -#define cap_set_full(c) do { cap_t(c) = ~0; } while(0)
>
> +# define cap_clear(c) do { (c) = __cap_empty_set; } while (0)
> +# define cap_set_full(c) do { (c) = __cap_full_set; } while (0)
> +# define cap_set_init_eff(c) do { (c) = __cap_init_eff_set; } while (0)
>
> Was it intentional, or an oversight, that this blows chunks in modules
> that try to use cap_clear() or cap_set_full() because the __cap_*
> symbols don't get an EXPORT_SYMBOL() attached to them?
I think that's one big oops, and the following is needed.
>From 9c217a6280b559cca28edab621d2d22288ce0ac6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:59:50 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] capabilities: export __cap_ symbols
Export __cap_empty_set and friends so that the cap_clear(),
cap_set_full() and cap_set_init_eff() defines can be used
by modules.
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
---
kernel/capability.c | 4 ++++
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c
index 9f2db55..064eb8a 100644
--- a/kernel/capability.c
+++ b/kernel/capability.c
@@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ const kernel_cap_t __cap_empty_set = CAP_EMPTY_SET;
const kernel_cap_t __cap_full_set = CAP_FULL_SET;
const kernel_cap_t __cap_init_eff_set = CAP_INIT_EFF_SET;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cap_empty_set);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cap_full_set);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cap_init_eff_set);
+
/*
* For sys_getproccap() and sys_setproccap(), any of the three
* capability set pointers may be NULL -- indicating that that set is
--
1.5.1.1.GIT
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-03 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-01 8:18 Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-12-03 15:03 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2007-12-06 1:46 ` Andrew Morgan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071203150308.GD9008@sergelap.austin.ibm.com \
--to=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morgan@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®