From: "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
herton@mandriva.com.br, dvgevers@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [local DoS] Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc4
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 14:04:25 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071204140425.05b0b458@mandriva.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071204160005.GA29783@elte.hu>
Em Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:00:05 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> escreveu:
|
| * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
|
| >
| >
| > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
| > >
| > > sched_rr_get_interval(1, NULL);
| >
| > Looks like we have a zero "cfs_rq->load.weight".
| >
| > Ingo? Both sched_slice() and __sched_slice() do a divide by the
| > runqueue weight, and at least dequeue_task_fair() explicitly checks
| > for that being zero, so clearly zero is a possible value. Hmm?
|
| yeah, i can reproduce this crash too.
|
| The problem is on SMP: if sched_rr_get_interval() gets a task from an
| otherwise idle runqueue, then rq->load.weight is 0. Normally
| sched_slice() is only used on a busy runqueue. So the correct fixup site
| is not in sched_slice() but in sys_sched_rr_get_interval() - i'm working
| on the right fix, i hope to be able to send a pull request in a few
| minutes.
Ingo, I can reproduce this w/o SMP support as well.
(Also, the backtrace I sent was reproduced on a UP machine with a
SMP kernel).
--
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-04 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-04 5:08 Linus Torvalds
2007-12-04 10:23 ` [build failure] Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc4 on S390x Kamalesh Babulal
2007-12-04 10:31 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-12-04 10:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-04 13:22 ` Linux 2.6.24-rc4 Nicolas Pitre
2007-12-04 16:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-12-04 14:07 ` [local DoS] " Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2007-12-04 15:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-04 16:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-04 16:04 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino [this message]
2007-12-04 16:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-04 16:18 ` [git pull] scheduler fixes Ingo Molnar
2007-12-04 16:40 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2007-12-04 18:28 ` Greg KH
2007-12-04 18:41 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2007-12-04 21:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-05 0:23 ` Linux 2.6.24-rc4 Diego Calleja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071204140425.05b0b458@mandriva.com.br \
--to=lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br \
--cc=dvgevers@xs4all.nl \
--cc=herton@mandriva.com.br \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome