From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754618AbXLIAFW (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2007 19:05:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753025AbXLIAFK (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2007 19:05:10 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:55139 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752996AbXLIAFJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2007 19:05:09 -0500 Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 16:04:49 -0800 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Justin Piszcz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.23.9 64-bit IRQ sharing without irqbalance with p35 vs i965? Message-ID: <20071208160449.033aaece@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Intel X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 18:44:39 -0500 (EST) Justin Piszcz wrote: > Can some please explain with almost identical kernel .config's I see > this on a p965 Intel board: your bios programmed the machines differently... the p965 has the higher performing settup, but still it's recommended to run the http://www.irqbalance.org program to spread interrupts around -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org