From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
notting@redhat.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, kay.sievers@vrfy.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: implement modules.order, take #2
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:11:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071213071156.GC13764@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <475936CE.70703@gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 09:04:30PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> When multiple built-in modules (especially drivers) provide the same
> capability, they're prioritized by link order specified by the order
> listed in Makefile. This implicit ordering is lost for loadable
> modules.
>
> When driver modules are loaded by udev, what comes first in
> modules.alias file is selected. However, the order in this file is
> indeterministic (depends on filesystem listing order of installed
> modules). This causes confusion.
>
> The solution is two-parted. This patch updates kbuild such that it
> generates and installs modules.order which contains the name of
> modules ordered according to Makefile. The second part is update to
> depmod such that it generates output files according to this file.
>
> Note that both obj-y and obj-m subdirs can contain modules and
> ordering information between those two are lost from beginning.
> Currently obj-y subdirs are put before obj-m subdirs.
>
> Sam Ravnborg cleaned up Makefile modifications and suggested using awk
> to remove duplicate lines from modules.order instead of using separate
> C program.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
> Cc: Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com>
> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
thanks for doing this, looks very nice.
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-13 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-07 12:04 Tejun Heo
2007-12-07 12:07 ` [PATCH] depmod: sort output according to " Tejun Heo
2007-12-09 9:30 ` Tejun Heo
2008-01-02 11:13 ` Tejun Heo
2008-01-02 23:12 ` Rusty Russell
2008-01-02 23:58 ` Jon Masters
2008-11-13 11:36 ` Tejun Heo
2008-11-13 19:30 ` Jon Masters
2008-11-15 19:20 ` Jon Masters
2008-11-16 5:25 ` Tejun Heo
2008-11-16 16:13 ` Kay Sievers
2007-12-13 7:12 ` Greg KH
2007-12-09 8:11 ` [PATCH] kbuild: implement " Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-13 7:11 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071213071156.GC13764@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=notting@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome