From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH - RFC] x86: unify arch/x86/kernel/Makefile(s)
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:11:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071230211108.GA14386@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071230150602.GU16946@elte.hu>
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 04:06:02PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> > > Combine the 32 and 64 bit specific Makefiles in one file. While
> > > doing so link order was (almost) preserved on 32 bit but on 64 bit
> > > link order changed a lot.
> > >
> > > Patch was checked with defconfig + allyesconfig builds. The same .o
> > > files were linked in these configurations.
> > >
> > > To keep readability of the Makefiles a few Kconfig symbols was
> > > added/modified and it was checked that they were not used anywhere
> > > else.
> >
> > hm, i agree with this change, but would it be possible to split this
> > up into gradual steps, to change the rules on 64-bit one by one? That
> > would make it much more bisectable. In our experience changes to the
> > link order have a high likelyhood of breaking stuff, as we've got so
> > many implicit initcall dependencies that are not explicitly spelled
> > out.
>
> i've added your full patch meanwhile - maybe we can get away with it.
>
> Still, if you see any easy way to do a straightforward series of ~40
> patches that changes one link rule per patch then that would be great
> and we could add them as an easier-to-bisect replacement for this one
> large-scope patch.
If it turns out to cause troubles I will redo it in a few smaller steps.
But I will have to do it by hand so most likely less than 10 steps.
Sam
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-30 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-30 8:29 Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-30 14:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-30 15:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-30 16:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-30 21:19 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-30 21:11 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071230211108.GA14386@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome