From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
glommer@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, ehabkost@redhat.com,
jeremy@goop.org, avi@qumranet.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
ak@suse.de, chrisw@sous-sol.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
hpa@zytor.com, zach@vmware.com, roland@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] remove __init modifier from header declaration
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:57:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080101165732.GB3488@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071231164624.GA1738@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru>
* Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > thanks, applied.
> >
> > btw., people have been talking about reducing the include file mess
> > for nearly a decade now,
>
> Some of us are actually doing it. ;-)
sorry, this was really not meant to slight your contributions in this
area in any way :-) I'm just judging by the spaghetti still hanging
around in asm-x86/*.h, and the 'fun' we have with paravirt and its type
dependencies - and the periodic messups we have with macros. (and many
macros are not inlines due to ugly dependencies.)
> > So include file dependency flattening patches would be more than
> > welcome as well.
>
> Yup! Provided they're compile-tested sufficiently well.
as long as it builds/boots on your box with a single convenient .config
of yours, we can stick such patches into x86.git and work out all the
build failures it might cause.
> > (and unlike unification patches they have no expectation of being
> > 100% perfect, so a natural ping-pong of fixes, until the changes are
> > fully correct, would be natural.)
>
> That way you'll never clean anything especially during merge window.
> ;-)
hm, what do you mean?
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-01 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-18 16:52 Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-18 16:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] finish processor.h integration Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-18 20:03 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-19 10:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] remove __init modifier from header declaration Ingo Molnar
2007-12-31 16:46 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-01-01 16:57 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080101165732.GB3488@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®