mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	glommer@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, ehabkost@redhat.com,
	jeremy@goop.org, avi@qumranet.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
	ak@suse.de, chrisw@sous-sol.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	hpa@zytor.com, zach@vmware.com, roland@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] remove __init modifier from header declaration
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:57:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080101165732.GB3488@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071231164624.GA1738@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru>


* Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:

> > thanks, applied.
> > 
> > btw., people have been talking about reducing the include file mess 
> > for nearly a decade now,
> 
> Some of us are actually doing it. ;-)

sorry, this was really not meant to slight your contributions in this 
area in any way :-) I'm just judging by the spaghetti still hanging 
around in asm-x86/*.h, and the 'fun' we have with paravirt and its type 
dependencies - and the periodic messups we have with macros. (and many 
macros are not inlines due to ugly dependencies.)

> > So include file dependency flattening patches would be more than 
> > welcome as well.
> 
> Yup! Provided they're compile-tested sufficiently well.

as long as it builds/boots on your box with a single convenient .config 
of yours, we can stick such patches into x86.git and work out all the 
build failures it might cause.

> > (and unlike unification patches they have no expectation of being 
> > 100% perfect, so a natural ping-pong of fixes, until the changes are 
> > fully correct, would be natural.)
> 
> That way you'll never clean anything especially during merge window. 
> ;-)

hm, what do you mean?

	Ingo

      reply	other threads:[~2008-01-01 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-18 16:52 Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-18 16:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] finish processor.h integration Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-18 20:03   ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-19 10:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] remove __init modifier from header declaration Ingo Molnar
2007-12-31 16:46   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-01-01 16:57     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080101165732.GB3488@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=avi@qumranet.com \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
    --cc=glommer@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=zach@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®