From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:35:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080101173532.1db4019f@the-village.bc.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080101163337.GX2360@does.not.exist>
> So smbfs is still considered rock solid while no serious distribution
> would be crazy enough to ship the EXPERIMENTAL NFSv4 support to their
> customers?
Thats a different problem. The kernel as I've said many times has no
proper process for
- removing expired/missing maintainers
- handling stuff that decays
- removing dead documentation
- removing dead drivers and ports
Although you've certainly started on fixing much of that.
> I'm not claiming that all EXPERIMENTAL tags were wrong [1], but many
> were wrong.
So why not fix the wrong tags, and mark smbfs obsolete ?
> Plus the fact that CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL controlled so many different
> things with one switch that CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=n .config's are really
> rare.
Agreed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-01 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-01 13:48 Adrian Bunk
2008-01-01 14:23 ` Alan Cox
2008-01-01 15:17 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-01 16:07 ` Alan Cox
2008-01-01 16:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-01 17:35 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2008-01-01 18:14 ` Jon Smirl
2008-01-02 0:06 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-01 14:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-01 14:30 ` Alan Cox
2008-01-01 14:57 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-01 15:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-01 18:04 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-01-10 22:18 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-01-11 10:41 ` Paul Mundt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-12-11 22:21 Adrian Bunk
2007-11-25 16:16 Adrian Bunk
2007-11-26 12:27 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-26 18:57 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-27 3:44 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-11-27 4:34 ` Dave Jones
2007-11-27 6:13 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-11-28 12:38 ` Krzysztof Halasa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080101173532.1db4019f@the-village.bc.nu \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®