mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Top 10 kernel oopses for the week ending January 5th, 2008
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 08:14:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080108081401.d9576ac5.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0801071851120.3148@woody.linux-foundation.org>

On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 19:26:12 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Kevin Winchester wrote:
> 
> > J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > 
> > > Is there any good basic documentation on this to point people at?
> > 
> > I would second this question.  I see people "decode" oops on lkml often 
> > enough, but I've never been entirely sure how its done.  Is it somewhere 
> > in Documentation?
> 
> It's actually not necessarily at all that trivial, unless you have a deep 
> understanding of the code generated for the architecture in question (and 
> even then, some oopses take more time to figure out than others, thanks 
> to inlining and tailcalls etc).
> 
> If the oops happened with a kernel you generated yourself, it's usually 
> rather easy. Especially if you said "y" to the "generate debugging info" 
> question at configuration time. Because, in that case, you really just do 
> a simple
> 
> 	gdb vmlinux
> 
> and then you can do (for example) something like setting a breakpoint at 
> the EIP that was reported for the oops, and it will tell you what line it 
> came from.
> 
> However, if you don't have the exact binary - which is the common case for 
> random oopses reported on lkml - you will generally have to disassemble 
> the hex sequence given in the oops (the "Code:" line), and try to match it 
> up against the source code to try to figure out what is going on.
> 
> Even just the disassembly is not entirely trivial, since the oops will 
> give you the eip that it happened at, but you often want to also 
> disassemble *backwards* in order to get more of a context (the "Code:" 
> line will mark the particular EIP that starts the oopsing instruction by 
> enclosing it in <xx>, but with non-constant instruction lengths, you need 
> to use a bit of trial-and-error to figure it out.
> 
> I usually just compile a small program like
> 
> 	const char array[]="\xnn\xnn\xnn...";
> 
> 	int main(int argc, char **argv)
> 	{
> 		printf("%p\n", array);
> 		*(int *)0=0;
> 	}
> 
> and run it under gdb, and then when it gets the SIGSEGV (due to the 
> obvious NULL pointer dereference), I can just ask gdb to disassemble 
> around the array that contains the code[] stuff. Try a few offsets, to see 
> when the disassembly makes sense (and gives the reported EIP as the 
> beginning of one of the disassembled instructions).
> 
> (You can do it other and smarter ways too, I'm not claiming that's a 
> particularly good way to do it, and the old "ksymoops" program used to do 
> a pretty good job of this, but I'm used to that particular idiotic way 
> myself, since it's how I've basically always done it)

One other way to do it (at least for x86-32/64) is to use
$kerneltree/scripts/decodecode.  It may work on other $arches also,
but I haven't tested it on others.

---
~Randy

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-01-08 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-05 21:06 Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-05 21:26 ` Al Viro
2008-01-05 21:39 ` Al Viro
2008-01-07 17:44   ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-01-08  1:19     ` Kevin Winchester
2008-01-08  3:26       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-08  5:59         ` Al Viro
2008-01-08  7:33           ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-01-10  4:13           ` Neil Brown
2008-01-10  5:53             ` Al Viro
2008-01-14  1:36               ` Neil Brown
2008-01-08 16:14         ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2008-01-08 17:42           ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-08 18:08             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-08 18:16               ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-08 18:27                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-08 19:05                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-08 19:31                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-08 22:56                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-08 17:08         ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-06  3:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-06  3:31   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-06  3:50     ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-09 14:12 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-09 15:28   ` Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080108081401.d9576ac5.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=kjwinchester@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome