mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@drzeus.cx>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] split MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:21:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080108202157.0b8d3393@poseidon.drzeus.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200801081329.39611.vapier.adi@gmail.com>

On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 13:29:39 -0500
Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:

> The on-chip Blackfin MMC/SD/SDIO host controller has the ability to do 1-bit
> MMC, 1-bit/4-bit SD, and 1-bit/4-bit SDIO.  Thus the current convention of
> MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA meaning "your host controller can do 1-bit or 4-bit for all
> modes" is insufficient for our needs.  The attached patch splits
> MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA into MMC_CAP_MMC_4_BIT_DATA and MMC_CAP_SD_4_BIT_DATA and
> updates all host controllers to include these in their caps and then changes
> existing code to check the new defines.  At the moment, SD/SDIO are lumped
> into MMC_CAP_SD_4_BIT_DATA ... should I bother with splitting that into SD and
> SDIO as well while I'm doing this ?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>

I fail to see why you need to split MMC and SD. Could you elaborate why the controller won't work with MMC cards? I haven't seen any differences from SD.

Rgds
-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
  PulseAudio, core developer          http://pulseaudio.org
  rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-08 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-08 18:29 Mike Frysinger
2008-01-08 19:21 ` Pierre Ossman [this message]
2008-01-08 19:40   ` Mike Frysinger
2008-01-08 20:49     ` Pierre Ossman
2008-01-08 21:44       ` Mike Frysinger
2008-01-09  7:21         ` Pierre Ossman
2008-01-09  2:32       ` Bryan Wu
2008-01-09  3:21         ` Cai, Cliff
2008-01-09  7:23           ` Pierre Ossman
2008-01-09 16:45             ` Bryan Wu
2008-01-10  8:54               ` Pierre Ossman
2008-01-10  9:22                 ` Bryan Wu
2008-01-10 11:57                   ` Pierre Ossman
2008-01-11  6:17                     ` Bryan Wu
2008-01-11  6:25                       ` Mike Frysinger
2008-01-11  8:40                       ` Pierre Ossman
2008-01-11  9:08                         ` Mike Frysinger
2008-01-11  9:35                           ` Pierre Ossman
2008-01-11  9:47                             ` Mike Frysinger
2008-01-11 10:05                               ` Pierre Ossman
2008-01-11 10:22                                 ` Bryan Wu
2008-01-11 11:18                                   ` Pierre Ossman
2008-01-11 17:52                             ` Robin Getz
2008-01-12 13:02                               ` Robin Getz
2008-01-12 15:24                                 ` Bryan Wu
2008-01-12 15:39                                 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-01-09  4:23 ` Bryan Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080108202157.0b8d3393@poseidon.drzeus.cx \
    --to=drzeus-mmc@drzeus.cx \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome