From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
To: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, a.zummo@towertech.it,
peterz@infradead.org, cbou@mail.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
krh@redhat.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, dwmw2@infradead.org,
davem@davemloft.net, jarkao2@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] convert semaphore to mutex in struct class
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:23:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080110142341.71af4dc5@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080110094843.GA3014@darkstar.te-china.tietoenator.com>
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:48:43 +0800,
Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> wrote:
Please add a kerneldoc comment for each of the new interfaces.
> +int class_for_each_device(struct class *class, void *data,
> + int (*fn)(struct device *, void *))
> +{
> + struct device *dev;
> + int error = 0;
> +
> + if (!class)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + mutex_lock(&class->mutex);
> + list_for_each_entry(dev, &class->devices, node) {
> + error = fn(dev, data);
Hm, the equivalent _for_each_device() functions all elevate the
device's refcount while calling fn(). I wonder whether we want this
here as well?
> + if (error)
> + break;
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&class->mutex);
> +
> + return error;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(class_for_each_device);
> +
> +struct device *class_find_device(struct class *class, void *data,
> + int (*match)(struct device *, void *))
> +{
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + if (!class)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&class->mutex);
> + list_for_each_entry(dev, &class->devices, node)
> + if (match(dev, data) && get_device(dev))
First get the reference and then drop it if the match function returns
0 to make this analogous to the other _find_device() functions?
> + break;
> + mutex_unlock(&class->mutex);
> +
> + return dev;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(class_find_device);
> +
> +int class_for_each_child(struct class *class, void *data,
> + int (*fn)(struct class_device *, void *))
Haven't looked at the callers, but isn't it better to convert them to
use struct device instead so we don't need to introduce new
class_device api?
> +{
> + struct class_device *dev;
> + int error = 0;
> +
> + if (!class)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + mutex_lock(&class->mutex);
> + list_for_each_entry(dev, &class->children, node) {
> + error = fn(dev, data);
Same comment as above concerning reference counts.
> + if (error)
> + break;
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&class->mutex);
> +
> + return error;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(class_for_each_child);
> +
> +struct class_device *class_find_child(struct class *class, void *data,
> + int (*match)(struct class_device *, void *))
> +{
> + struct class_device *dev;
> +
> + if (!class)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&class->mutex);
> + list_for_each_entry(dev, &class->children, node)
> + if (match(dev, data) && class_device_get(dev))
And here.
> + break;
> + mutex_unlock(&class->mutex);
> +
> + return dev;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(class_find_child);
> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-10 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-03 5:50 Dave Young
2008-01-03 7:06 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-01-03 7:24 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-01-03 7:21 ` Dave Young
2008-01-03 7:41 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-01-06 18:41 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-07 2:09 ` Dave Young
2008-01-07 8:45 ` Greg KH
2008-01-07 9:01 ` David Brownell
2008-01-07 13:23 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-07 14:00 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-01-07 16:36 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-07 15:44 ` Greg KH
2008-01-07 17:13 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-07 17:20 ` Greg KH
2008-01-08 7:05 ` Dave Young
2008-01-08 22:48 ` Greg KH
2008-01-09 1:32 ` Dave Young
2008-01-09 6:13 ` Dave Young
2008-01-09 6:37 ` Dave Young
2008-01-09 6:39 ` Dave Young
2008-01-10 9:48 ` Dave Young
2008-01-10 12:34 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-11 2:18 ` Dave Young
2008-01-10 13:23 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2008-01-11 2:33 ` Dave Young
2008-01-11 8:23 ` Cornelia Huck
2008-01-11 8:53 ` Dave Young
2008-01-10 15:41 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-11 2:37 ` Dave Young
2008-01-10 18:39 ` Greg KH
2008-01-11 2:40 ` Dave Young
2008-01-07 17:25 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-07 10:00 ` Dave Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080110142341.71af4dc5@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
--to=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=cbou@mail.ru \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=krh@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®