From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762725AbYALWns (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:43:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759072AbYALWnl (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:43:41 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:34912 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758967AbYALWnk (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:43:40 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Harvey Harrison Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:46:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) Cc: LKML , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Adrian Bunk References: <200801122205.34871.rjw@sisk.pl> <1200176184.19760.100.camel@brick> In-Reply-To: <1200176184.19760.100.camel@brick> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801122346.12709.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday, 12 of January 2008, Harvey Harrison wrote: > On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 22:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the > > appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?] > > Perhaps keep the regression report as-is, but for each regression with > a patch follow up with an appropriately CC'd reply to the regression > report. Similar in concept to the regression report being patch 0/X > or how the -stable series patches are announced? That's exactly what I'm thinking about. :-) Thanks, Rafael