From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753940AbYAMAKM (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:10:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752229AbYAMAKA (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:10:00 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:35195 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751479AbYAMAKA (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:10:00 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Frans Pop Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:12:12 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, bunk@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@linux-foundation.org References: <200801122205.34871.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801130112.13701.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday, 13 of January 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.23, please let me > > know either and I'll add them to the list. > > Does this qualify as a regression? I guess so. > I have not seen a fix posted for it yet. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/16/121 > Follow-ups: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/6/228 Thanks for the pointer, I'll add it to the list. Rafael