From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755971AbYAOBd4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:33:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752173AbYAOBdt (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:33:49 -0500 Received: from sca-es-mail-1.Sun.COM ([192.18.43.132]:33487 "EHLO sca-es-mail-1.sun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751894AbYAOBds (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:33:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:39:35 -0800 From: Yinghai Lu Subject: [PATCH] x86_64: checking aperture report for node instead of cpu In-reply-to: <20080114083545.GF18296@elte.hu> To: Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner Cc: Christoph Lameter , ebiederm@xmission.com, LKML Message-id: <200801141739.35448.yinghai.lu@sun.com> Organization: Sun MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline References: <200801101914.47967.yinghai.lu@sun.com> <200801120207.19981.yinghai.lu@sun.com> <20080114083545.GF18296@elte.hu> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org this one is against x86.git [PATCH] x86_64: checking aperture report for node instead of cpu currently when gart iommu is enabled by BIOS or previous we got " Checking aperture... CPU 0: aperture @4000000 size 64MB CPU 1: aperture @4000000 size 64MB " we should use use Node instead. we will get " Checking aperture... Node 0: aperture @4000000 size 64MB Node 1: aperture @4000000 size 64MB " Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c @@ -312,6 +312,7 @@ void __init gart_iommu_hole_init(void) u32 aper_size, aper_alloc = 0, aper_order = 0, last_aper_order = 0; u64 aper_base, last_aper_base = 0; int fix, num, valid_agp = 0; + int node; if (gart_iommu_aperture_disabled || !fix_aperture || !early_pci_allowed()) @@ -320,6 +321,7 @@ void __init gart_iommu_hole_init(void) printk(KERN_INFO "Checking aperture...\n"); fix = 0; + node = 0; for (num = 24; num < 32; num++) { if (!early_is_k8_nb(read_pci_config(0, num, 3, 0x00))) continue; @@ -332,8 +334,8 @@ void __init gart_iommu_hole_init(void) aper_base = read_pci_config(0, num, 3, 0x94) & 0x7fff; aper_base <<= 25; - printk(KERN_INFO "CPU %d: aperture @ %Lx size %u MB\n", - num-24, aper_base, aper_size>>20); + printk(KERN_INFO "Node %d: aperture @ %Lx size %u MB\n", + node++, aper_base, aper_size >> 20); if (!aperture_valid(aper_base, aper_size)) { fix = 1;