From: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@pengutronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc7-rt1
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:49:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080114194957.GQ27137@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0801131544430.10093@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 03:48:33PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Works fine on phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny, here are the latest results:
> > http://www.pengutronix.de/oselas/realtime/results/20080113-1/
>
> That doesn't look too bad. Or is over a 100us not good for that box?
I think it's ok. However, Wolfgang still sees strange long delays on his
Icecube, so it was mainly for comparism.
> Also is it SMP?
Nope, UP. This one:
http://www.phytec.de/phytec/32-bit_module/phycore-mpc5200b-tiny.html
The CPU is basically a 603e core plus peripherals.
> Yeah, I didn't make any attempt to fix latency_tracing for PPC on this
> release. I expected as much. I do have a couple of PPC boxes that I can
> play with, and I'll see if I can get that working too before -rt2. But I
> want to get a stable x86 release out fast.
Yup, great, thanks!
Robert
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-14 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-13 19:00 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 Steven Rostedt
2008-01-13 19:53 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt1: macro "put_cpu_var" passed 2 arguments, but takes just 1 Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-01-13 20:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-01-13 20:25 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 Robert Schwebel
2008-01-13 20:48 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 Steven Rostedt
2008-01-14 19:49 ` Robert Schwebel [this message]
2008-01-13 20:43 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-01-13 20:54 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 Steven Rostedt
2008-01-14 8:27 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 Mike Galbraith
2008-01-14 12:13 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 Gregory Haskins
2008-01-14 13:25 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 Mike Galbraith
2008-01-14 14:29 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 Mike Galbraith
2008-01-15 8:07 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 Mike Galbraith
2008-01-15 9:28 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 Mike Galbraith
2008-01-15 16:50 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 Gregory Haskins
2008-01-14 18:39 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 S.Çağlar Onur
2008-01-14 16:52 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 Steven Rostedt
2008-01-13 22:56 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 Mark Knecht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080114194957.GQ27137@pengutronix.de \
--to=r.schwebel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®