From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: caglar@pardus.org.tr, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc7-rt2
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:17:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080116131703.62d76abe@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24149.1200455417@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
> Playing devil's advocate here - the claim is that EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL is to
> indicate that code is getting too chummy with Linux internals.
>
> However, in *this* case, isn't it "code that is too chummy with *GCC* internals",
> and thus it isn't our place to say what can and can't be done with code that
> is derivative of the GCC compiler? ;)
Yes. It would be something to discuss with the FSF.
However I don't think it matters. If you are doing instruction profiling
you need *all* the code built with profiling to get good results. You
can't rebuild the Nvidia modules so you can't profile them.
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-16 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-14 18:41 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Steven Rostedt
2008-01-14 20:02 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Mark Knecht
2008-01-14 22:16 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-01-14 22:30 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Steven Rostedt
2008-01-15 17:10 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-01-17 2:07 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Steven Rostedt
2008-01-17 17:11 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-01-17 17:25 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Steven Rostedt
2008-01-17 17:57 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-01-15 0:37 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 S.Çağlar Onur
2008-01-16 3:50 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-16 4:04 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Steven Rostedt
2008-01-16 6:23 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-16 14:12 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Steven Rostedt
2008-01-16 16:22 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Steven Rostedt
2008-01-21 11:31 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Esben Nielsen
2008-01-21 12:49 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Steven Rostedt
2008-01-27 21:51 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Esben Nielsen
2008-01-28 2:32 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Stefan Monnier
2008-01-16 13:17 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2008-01-16 4:01 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Steven Rostedt
2008-01-16 7:12 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 S.Çağlar Onur
2008-01-16 10:11 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 S.Çağlar Onur
2008-01-17 2:20 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Steven Rostedt
2008-01-15 3:44 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2: WARNING: at include/linux/rcupreempt.h:110 rcu_enter_nohz() Mike Galbraith
2008-01-15 16:27 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Luotao Fu
2008-01-15 18:06 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Steven Rostedt
2008-01-15 20:04 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 Luotao Fu
2008-01-16 12:03 ` 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 [PATCH] latency tracer fix for ppc32 Luotao Fu
2008-01-17 3:26 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080116131703.62d76abe@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=caglar@pardus.org.tr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®