From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zan Lynx <zlynx@acm.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1] Locking API boot-time self-tests hangs.
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:19:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080117181935.02294863.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200801180120.m0I1KBuC065806@www262.sakura.ne.jp>
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:20:11 +0900 Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I found the CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKING_API_SELFTESTS hangs
> at (A-A deadlock)-(wlock) pair.
>
> 2.6.24-rc8 doesn't hang.
> So, I think the bug is in 2.6.24-rc8-mm1.bz2 .
>
> The kernel configs are at
>
> http://I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp/tmp/config-2.6.24-rc8
> http://I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp/tmp/config-2.6.24-rc8-mm1
>
Yes, Zan hit the same bug.
>
> ---------- 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 ----------
> Linux version 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 (root@tomoyo) (gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13)) #2 SMP Fri Jan 18 10:13:09 JST 2008
> BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009f800 (usable)
> BIOS-e820: 000000000009f800 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
> BIOS-e820: 00000000000ca000 - 00000000000cc000 (reserved)
> BIOS-e820: 00000000000dc000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
> BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000001fef0000 (usable)
> BIOS-e820: 000000001fef0000 - 000000001feff000 (ACPI data)
> BIOS-e820: 000000001feff000 - 000000001ff00000 (ACPI NVS)
> BIOS-e820: 000000001ff00000 - 0000000020000000 (usable)
> BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec10000 (reserved)
> BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved)
> BIOS-e820: 00000000fffe0000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
> 0MB HIGHMEM available.
> 512MB LOWMEM available.
> found SMP MP-table at 000f6c90
> Zone PFN ranges:
> DMA 0 -> 4096
> Normal 4096 -> 131072
> HighMem 131072 -> 131072
> Movable zone start PFN for each node
> early_node_map[1] active PFN ranges
> 0: 0 -> 131072
> DMI present.
> Intel MultiProcessor Specification v1.4
> Virtual Wire compatibility mode.
> OEM ID: INTEL Product ID: 440BX APIC at: 0xFEE00000
> Processor #0 6:15 APIC version 17
> Processor #1 6:15 APIC version 17
> I/O APIC #2 Version 17 at 0xFEC00000.
> Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 1 I/O APICs
> Processors: 2
> Allocating PCI resources starting at 30000000 (gap: 20000000:dec00000)
> Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 130048
> Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda1 ro noapic nolapic console=ttyS0,115200n8
> Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
> Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.
> Initializing CPU#0
> CPU 0 irqstacks, hard=c0523000 soft=c0521000
> PID hash table entries: 2048 (order: 11, 8192 bytes)
> Detected 1993.105 MHz processor.
> Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
> console [ttyS0] enabled
> Lock dependency validator: Copyright (c) 2006 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo Molnar
> ... MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES: 8
> ... MAX_LOCK_DEPTH: 30
> ... MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS: 2048
> ... CLASSHASH_SIZE: 1024
> ... MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES: 8192
> ... MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS: 16384
> ... CHAINHASH_SIZE: 8192
> memory used by lock dependency info: 1024 kB
> per task-struct memory footprint: 1680 bytes
> ------------------------
> | Locking API testsuite:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | spin |wlock |rlock |mutex | wsem | rsem |
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> A-A deadlock: ok |
So does this mean that we got stuck in the first write_lock() test?
I'd be suspecting git-sched, so in lieu of a full bisection search it would
be great if one of you could apply
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/git-sched.patch to 2.6.24-rc8 and see if it
fails in the same way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-18 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-18 1:20 Tetsuo Handa
2008-01-18 2:19 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-01-18 3:19 ` Tetsuo Handa
2008-01-18 4:42 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-18 6:40 ` Tetsuo Handa
2008-01-18 6:59 ` Dave Young
2008-01-18 8:21 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-18 8:56 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-18 9:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 9:38 ` Tetsuo Handa
2008-01-18 9:49 ` Dave Young
2008-01-18 9:19 ` Tetsuo Handa
2008-01-18 16:27 ` Zan Lynx
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080117181935.02294863.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=zlynx@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome