From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758417AbYAUVaw (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:30:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751818AbYAUVam (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:30:42 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:38269 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751645AbYAUVal (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:30:41 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:29:20 -0800 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Harvey Harrison Cc: Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RFC] x86: Make page fault oopses similar Message-ID: <20080121132920.6975077d@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <1200950446.16972.25.camel@brick> References: <1200950446.16972.25.camel@brick> Organization: Intel X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.3; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:20:46 -0800 Harvey Harrison wrote: > Introduce printk_address to X86_32 in a simplified form for > now. Reformat X86_64 printk_address to avoid two declarations. > > Change the printk formats on X86_32 and 64 to be similar. I'm not entirely convinced on this; I need to look closer but it appears the 32 bit version doesn't use the "reliable" argument to print a ? in front of the dubious backtrace entries; that would be sort of a step backwards; ( -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org