Re: [RFC][PATCH] VFS: create /proc/<pid>/mountinfo

["Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>]

Quoting Miklos Szeredi (miklos@szeredi.hu):
> > On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 22:25 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > > 	You have removed the code that checked if the peer or
> > > > 	master mount was in the same namespace before reporting their
> > > > 	corresponding mount-ids. One downside of that approach is the
> > > > 	user will see an mount_id in the output with no corresponding
> > > > 	line to explain the details of the mount_id.  
> > > 
> > > Before the change, the peer and master ID's were basically randomly
> > > chosen from the peers, which means, it wasn't possible to always
> > > determine, that two mounts were peers, or that they were slaves to the
> > > same peer group.
> > > 
> > > After the change, this is possible, since the peer ID will be the same
> > > for all mounts which are peers.  This means, that even though the peer
> > > ID might be in a different namespace, it is possible to determine all
> > > peers within the same namespace by comparing their peer ID's.
> > 
> > 
> >  I agree with your reasoning on the random id; showing a single
> >  id avoids clutter. But my point is, why not show a
> >  id for the master or peer residing in the same namespace?
> 
> Because this way it is possible see propagation between different
> namespaces as well, by looking at the mount information for processes
> in the different namespaces.  Of course, this is only possible with
> sufficient privileges.

Gotta say I agree with Miklos this would be useful.  I'd far prefer to
see the id than a -1.

thanks,
-serge

> >  Showing a id with no corresponding entry for that id, can be
> >  intriguing.
> 
> Not if it's clearly documented (will add documentation for the next
> submission).
> 
> Miklos
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html