From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1754484AbYA3Vfi@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754484AbYA3Vfi (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:35:38 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753384AbYA3Vf3
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:35:29 -0500
Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:48309 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752821AbYA3Vf1 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:35:27 -0500
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-git7: section mismatches woes
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:32:52 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012)
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <200801301950.44403.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080130190829.GA25490@uranus.ravnborg.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080130190829.GA25490@uranus.ravnborg.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200801302232.53306.rjw@sisk.pl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wednesday, 30 of January 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 07:50:43PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I get these messages, the majority of which seem to be false-positives:
> ...
> > modpost: Found 35 section mismatch(es).
> > To see additional details select "Enable full Section mismatch analysis"
> > in the Kernel Hacking menu (CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH).
> Looking in to these atm.
> 
> > 
> > and if I compile the kernel with CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH, it breaks resuming
> > from RAM.
> 
> The only functional difference when you enable CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH is the
> addition of the -fno-inline-functions-called-once to CFLAGS.
> So we have some code somewhere that breaks if it is not inlined by gcc.
> 
> It would be nice to sort out where.
> If you have a rough idea where to look

No, I don't.

It looks like there's somewhere in arch/x86, since I ruled out kernel/power and
drivers/acpi already.

Thanks,
Rafael