mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: about relocs.c on x86
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:11:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080131101111.GB11867@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1201773740.23523.17.camel@brick>


* Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> wrote:

> > during the big first phase of unification we generally kept file 
> > names untouched if they were only present in one of the previous 
> > architectures. I.e. pure 32-bit and pure 64-bit files were not 
> > renamed to _32/_64.
> > 
> > Now that we've got lots of unified 32/64-bit files it might make 
> > sense to rename the 'standalone' ones into _32/_64 if they share the 
> > same directory with 32/64-bit source files - to reduce the 
> > confusion. And given that for example 
> > arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c is unified while 
> > arch/x86/boot/compressed/relocs.c is 32-bit only, i'd agree with 
> > your observation. Feel free to send a rename patch for such cases.
> 
> I'd argue that eliminating the _32/_64 suffixes through unification 
> and not adding any more would be better.  Renaming at this point seems 
> like the wrong side of the cost/benefit line.  When the makefiles 
> finally get unified, that would be a natural list of what is 32 
> bit-only and what is 64 bit-only, and additional suffixes wouldn't add 
> much to that.

no strong opinion from me - but i think it should be obvious to the 
developer when they are looking at a .c file that it's 32-bit only (or 
64-bit only). I.e. the default is that whatever .c file we look at is 
unified - and in that sense relocs.c breaks that general expectation.

In fact renaming it to _32.c might spur its unification: people might 
say "hm, this would be handy on 64-bit as well". We might even do that 
to directories - so that for example arch/x86/math-emu/ would become 
arch/x86/match-emu_32/.

( Hey, and maybe someone is crazy enough to try to port the math-emu 
  code to 64-bit and boot Linux up on 64-bit with all user-space FPU ops 
  emulated. It would be one of the most useless hacks of all times, and 
  that certainly has a certain kind of sick appeal to it, doesnt it? ;-))

but it's really not a big issue, we can certainly leave it alone and 
observe the situation as more stuff gets unified. I'd expect it all fall 
into place naturally.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-31 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-31  8:07 Yinghai Lu
2008-01-31  8:33 ` Chris Snook
2008-01-31  9:13   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-01-31  9:17     ` Chris Snook
2008-01-31  9:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 10:02   ` Harvey Harrison
2008-01-31 10:11     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-01-31 10:21       ` Harvey Harrison
2008-01-31 10:38       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-31 10:44         ` Harvey Harrison
2008-01-31 12:04         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 17:47       ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080131101111.GB11867@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®