From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762122AbYBAXZL (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:25:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760355AbYBAXY6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:24:58 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:49594 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760314AbYBAXY5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:24:57 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 00:24:15 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , LKML , Dmitry Adamushko Subject: Re: [Regression] 2.6.24-git3: Major annoyance during suspend/hibernation on x86-64 (bisected) Message-ID: <20080201232415.GB30387@elte.hu> References: <200801272229.48955.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080201124702.GA31321@elte.hu> <200802011542.42483.rjw@sisk.pl> <200802020019.25599.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200802020019.25599.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, 1 of February 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, 1 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > > The below fixes it for me.. > > > > > > > > --- > > > > - restore the old wakeup mechanism > > > > - fix break usage in do_each_thread() { } while_eac_thread(). > > > > - fix the hotplug switch stmt, a fall-through case was broken. > > > > > > thanks Peter, i've picked your fix up. I hope this solves the problem > > > for Rafael too. > > > > No, it doesn't, unfortunately. Actually, it breaks things even more, as > > suspend now hangs (probably deadlocks) while disabling the nonboot CPU. > > For some obscure reason, I'm no longer able to reproduce the problem > with the Peter's patch and I think it's correct. You can add > > Tested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > to it. Great! I sent the fix to Linus with your Tested-by line. Thanks Rafael for all the testing! Ingo