From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933765AbYBBTjM (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:39:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759585AbYBBTi7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:38:59 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:54200 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758516AbYBBTi6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:38:58 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 20:38:43 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Pavel Machek Cc: David Brownell , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, kernel list Subject: Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test Message-ID: <20080202193843.GB32039@elte.hu> References: <20080130131748.GA3796@elf.ucw.cz> <200802020931.38689.david-b@pacbell.net> <20080202180002.GB26560@elte.hu> <200802021113.22130.david-b@pacbell.net> <20080202193202.GB31621@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080202193202.GB31621@elf.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Pavel Machek wrote: > > It would have been easier to just use the public interface and > > hard-wire "rtc0". But going directly to the hardware was dirtier, > > and more in the spirit of "hack that obviously shouldn't go upstream > > until it gets done properly". > > Yes, it was "quick and dirty". And I do not think it is going upstream > in this form...? which would be a pity - this thing _almost_ started doing suspend and resume cycles on my testsystems, all by itself :-) Ingo