From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932693AbYBBXcz (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 18:32:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756652AbYBBXcq (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 18:32:46 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:40939 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764112AbYBBXcq (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 18:32:46 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:23:45 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net, Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz Subject: Re: [patch] pci: pci_enable_device_bars() fix Message-ID: <20080202232345.GB20240@kroah.com> References: <20080201231147.GA18174@suse.de> <20080202111322.GA30767@elte.hu> <20080202184441.GA12301@suse.de> <20080202190558.GB27927@elte.hu> <47A4D8E4.8030708@garzik.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47A4D8E4.8030708@garzik.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 03:56:04PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Greg KH wrote: > > > >>> ( This call has been introduced upstream 3 weeks ago by commit > >>> 8a4df120b07, but the PCI tree has apparently not been fully > >>> re-tested with Linus-latest since that point. ) > >> Wait, my testing caught this. I made the change to the patch myself, > >> adding the needed conversion to my tree, it's here, on my disk! > >> > >> Oh crap, I never checked it in. > >> > >> /me goes off to sulk in shame. > > > > you might want to join the (sizable) club of us deeply ashamed people > > who recently introduced upstream build failures :-/ > > Personal CC differences aside I do think you guys both do a good > job of staying on top of your subsystems. Heh, thanks. > We all wear the brown paper bag on occasion, and with the "merge > maelstrom" during each merge window, I'm quite frankly amazed at how > _little_ stuff get broken overall. Yeah, I re-ran some statistics the other day on our kernel development rate, and changed my formula after Andrew accused me of severely undercounting the rate of change. Turns out that as of 2.6.24-rc8 for the 2.6.24 kernel release we did: lines added per day: 4945 lines removed per day: 2006 lines modified per day: 1702 And note, that is real stuff, not renames or file moves at all, git handles not reporting that. That's for the 99 days that it took to do 2.6.24-rc8 (I need to re-run the scripts now that 2.6.24 is out.) It's fricken scarily amazing that things are still working at all... Just something to make you all sleep well at night :) thanks, greg k-h