From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753566AbYBCUi3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:38:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752035AbYBCUiT (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:38:19 -0500 Received: from pasmtpb.tele.dk ([80.160.77.98]:59329 "EHLO pasmtpB.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752011AbYBCUiS (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:38:18 -0500 Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:38:22 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: James Bottomley Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Hannes Reinecke , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [patch] scsi: fix spurious build failures in aic7xxx Message-ID: <20080203203822.GE2648@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20080202140326.GA6544@elte.hu> <20080202140630.GA7939@elte.hu> <20080202141857.GA8635@elte.hu> <20080202162611.GA24765@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080202171020.GB12748@elte.hu> <20080203045441.GA12128@elte.hu> <20080203074143.GA19981@uranus.ravnborg.org> <1202066623.3318.95.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080203200558.GC2648@uranus.ravnborg.org> <1202069700.3318.100.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1202069700.3318.100.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > drivers/base/attribute_container.c: * Copyright (c) 2005 - James Bottomley > > drivers/base/transport_class.c: * Copyright (c) 2005 - James Bottomley > > drivers/scsi/raid_class.c: * Copyright (c) 2005 - James Bottomley > > include/linux/attribute_container.h: * Copyright (c) 2005 - James Bottomley > > include/linux/raid_class.h: * Copyright (c) 2005 - James Bottomley > > include/linux/transport_class.h: * Copyright (c) 2005 - James Bottomley > > This is less obvious: The copyrights are historical rather than current > and also, I was at steeleye when I did that work, so it does deserve to > be reflected in the file history. I know it adds confusion from a whom > do I contact for this file point of view, but it is legally the right > thing to do. When I read the above is that the Copyright are assigned to the person "James Bottomley" with an email address. If Steeleye deserve copyrights then _I_ would have explicitly stated the company name too. Sam