mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] x86 updates
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:36:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080205213650.GB14708@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802051043550.9374@woody.linux-foundation.org>


* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> Ingo, Thomas,
>  should we not do this?
> 
> Otherwise, it seems we generate a section that isn't allocated?
> 
> I think toolchain should add the right flags automatically for 
> sections that start with ".[ro]data" and ".text", but not for the 
> kernel-specific ".init.*" sections.

>  #ifndef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> -	.pushsection .init.data
> +	.pushsection .init.data,"aw"
>  #endif

hm, did you get linker errors due to an unallocated section discarded 
from the vmlinux?

Sam says that forgetting the "aw" attribute means it's .init.data.1, so 
the standard vmlinux.lds rule does not pick it up:

  .init.text : AT(ADDR(.init.text) - LOAD_OFFSET) {
        _sinittext = .;
        INIT_TEXT
        _einittext = .;
  }

as INIT_TEXT is defined as:

#define INIT_TEXT                                                       \
        *(.init.text)                                                   \

which wouldnt pick up .init.text.1, and the linker would thus discard 
the section?

i'm wondering whether it's possible to add a wildcard, something like 
this:

#define INIT_TEXT                                                       \
        *(.init.text*)                                                  \

? That way even if we forget the attribute, it gets picked up.

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-02-05 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-04 16:12 Ingo Molnar
2008-02-05 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-05 19:22   ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-05 21:05     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-05 21:09       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-02-05 21:18         ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-05 21:23           ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-02-05 21:32             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-05 21:42               ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-02-05 21:17       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-05 21:54         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-05 22:03           ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-02-05 20:12   ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-02-05 21:36   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-20 16:49 [GIT PULL] " Ingo Molnar
2009-01-07 18:15 [git pull] " Ingo Molnar
2008-07-15 21:01 [GIT " Thomas Gleixner
2008-07-15 21:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15 21:25   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-15 21:43   ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-07-15 22:00     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15 22:05       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-15 22:14         ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-07-15 23:29           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-29 16:00 [git " Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 14:21 Ingo Molnar
2008-02-29 18:08 Ingo Molnar
2008-02-25 16:27 Ingo Molnar
2008-02-19 23:13 [GIT " Thomas Gleixner
2008-02-19 23:56 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-20  0:06   ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-02-20  8:32   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-18 20:21 [GIT Pull] " Thomas Gleixner
2008-02-13 15:57 [git pull] " Ingo Molnar
2008-02-13 16:19 ` Balbir Singh
2008-02-14 16:25   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-14 17:42     ` Avi Kivity
2008-02-15  3:30       ` Balbir Singh
2008-02-15  8:04       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-14 10:25 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-14 15:19   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-14 17:10     ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-09 23:24 Thomas Gleixner
2008-02-10  1:25 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-10  8:03   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-10  9:14     ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-02-10 23:09       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-06 14:47 Ingo Molnar
2008-02-01 17:00 Ingo Molnar
2008-01-14 19:02 Ingo Molnar
2008-01-15 16:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-10  3:52 [GIT " Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-23 21:02 [Git " Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080205213650.GB14708@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®