Re: [PATCH] Replace nvidia timer override quirk with pci id list

[Prakash Punnoor <prakash@punnoor.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1708 bytes --]

Am Samstag 09 Februar 2008 schrieben Sie:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 04:51:05PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > On the day of Saturday 09 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > > We discussed this back then with Nvidia engineers and they stated
> > > that only NF5 would need timer overrides.
> >
> > Can I get a link which verifies your statement? I provided one which kind
> > of contradicts yours.
>
> Sorry cannot supply links to them, they were private mail. For some
> reason the Nvidia people seem to be shy to post to mailing lists.

Too bad that you cannot make them publish their infos.

>
> iirc the thread which inspired this patch (together with several
> bugs in both novell and kernel.org bugzilla) was
>
> http://marc.info/?t=116175224500001&r=1&w=2

Interesting, this was where I posted, as well...

> So you have to trust me on that -- it's a bit similar to as to I have
> to trust your not yet produced boot log and test results.

And I won't, as I reverted to my stable kernel again and thus patching it 
again (yes it was 2.6.24 with early-quirks.c from git and your patch on top) 
doesn't give more info then I already provided. Furthermore I also told you 
that because of missing nforce2 ID the practical test wasn't really 
necessary.


Just add this line to your patch:

+       QBRIDGE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_NVIDIA_NFORCE2, 
nvidia_timer),


So that the quirk gets applied for nForce2, then your patch is - while still 
wrong in my eyes - not a regression anymore (for me) and thus I would take 
back my NAK(, but still not ACK it).

bye,
-- 
(°=                 =°)
//\ Prakash Punnoor /\\
V_/                 \_V

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]