From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754815AbYBJTeP (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:34:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752041AbYBJTeB (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:34:01 -0500 Received: from pasmtpa.tele.dk ([80.160.77.114]:38751 "EHLO pasmtpA.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752026AbYBJTeA (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:34:00 -0500 Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:34:06 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Wessel Subject: Re: [git pull] kgdb light, v5 Message-ID: <20080210193406.GD13733@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20080210071304.GA3788@elte.hu> <20080210104709.GB10790@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080210163603.GB28201@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080210163603.GB28201@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > so lets please all keep that goal in mind. This is not about "will we > have KGDB support or not", this is about "WHERE will we have KGDB > support", and i strongly support the notion that it should be in the > core kernel, where we can keep it clean, tidy and architecturally agile. I think it was good to remind people that this is mostly generic cross-architecture kgdb support and that x86 is just the first adaptor. Sam