From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] x86: allow 64bit setting in Kconfig
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:50:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080211165055.GA2959@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080211163740.GA2446@elte.hu>
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 05:37:40PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > > make ARCH=i386 randconfig
> > >
> > > on a 64-bit box that has a 32-bit .config in its kernel directory.
> > >
> > > The randconfig/allyesconfig/allnoconfig variants override whatever
> > > is in the current .config. Making the result depend on whatever is
> > > in the .config at the moment is fundamentally wrong.
> > >
> > > "oldconfig" on the other hand has correct sensitivity to the
> > > existing .config - and that always worked correctly. So if you pop a
> > > 32-bit or a 64-bit .config into a kernel tree, that will be listened
> > > to, no matter whether you are on a 32-bit or on a 64-bit host.
> >
> > Do you have ARCH=x86 set in your environment, the command line or
> > patched into your Makefile when this works for you?
>
> nope, it happens with vanilla and no ARCH environment variable set that
> i know of. So you cannot see this behavior?
No.
In my experience there is no way for me to enable 64BIT without somehow
manually fiddling with ARCH.
No matter whether it's menuconfig or oldconfig or whatever else.
> Ingo
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-11 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-28 22:09 Adrian Bunk
2008-02-01 15:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-04 20:45 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-11 16:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-11 16:50 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-02-11 17:13 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-11 17:30 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080211165055.GA2959@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi \
--to=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®