mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Linux-tiny@selenic.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Configure out DMI scanning code
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:33:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080212083323.6d579dc3@crazy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1202756478.28085.35.camel@cinder.waste.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1197 bytes --]

Hi Matt,

Thanks for your review.

Le Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:01:18 -0600,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> a écrit :

> Looks ok. Please preserve original authorship (ie me) in some fashion
> in your description.

Andrew seems to already have picked up the patch in -mm (I received an
e-mail + x86-configurable-dmi-scanning-code.patch added to -mm tree).
If I resend a new one with proper credits, will Andrew pick it up and
replace the old version by the new version ?

> > On top of this patch, I've tested if removing the big dmi tables in
> > the code (for example in arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c) would allow to
> > make more space optimizations. However, it seems that simply
> > defining dmi_check_system() to an empty static inlined function
> > already allows gcc to optimize out the dmi tables, because there
> > are not present in the code. Is that possible, or is my
> > understanding incorrect ?
> 
> That's possible with modern gccs, yes.

I was compiling with 4.2.3, which I suppose is a modern gcc.

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Free Embedded Linux Training Materials
on http://free-electrons.com/training
(More than 1500 pages!)

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-12  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-11 16:58 Thomas Petazzoni
2008-02-11 19:01 ` Matt Mackall
2008-02-12  7:33   ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2008-02-12  7:42     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080212083323.6d579dc3@crazy \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=Linux-tiny@selenic.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®