From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: jdmason@kudzu.us, bzolnier@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
discuss@x86-64.org
Subject: Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:32:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080213093225.GA16985@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080213001638.GB13933@kroah.com>
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:16:38PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Why does the calgary driver need this? Can we just use
> pci_get_device() instead? Why do you need to walk the device list
> backwards? Do you get false positives going forward?
It's not strictly needed, we used it for symmetry. Feel free to nuke
it and walk the list forward.
Cheers,
Muli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-13 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-13 0:15 "ide=reverse" do we still " Greg KH
2008-02-13 0:16 ` pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary " Greg KH
2008-02-13 2:17 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-13 4:45 ` Greg KH
2008-02-13 12:34 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-13 17:28 ` Greg KH
2008-02-13 18:16 ` Greg KH
2008-02-13 22:20 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-13 23:41 ` Greg KH
2008-02-14 0:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-14 4:58 ` Greg KH
2008-02-14 13:09 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-02-14 7:44 ` [discuss] " Andreas Jaeger
2008-02-14 12:11 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-15 7:17 ` Greg KH
2008-02-20 0:39 ` Greg KH
2008-02-13 9:32 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda [this message]
2008-02-13 17:32 ` Greg KH
2008-02-13 17:47 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-02-13 18:14 ` Greg KH
2008-02-15 7:17 ` Greg KH
2008-02-15 7:48 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-02-15 15:20 ` Greg KH
2008-02-15 15:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-15 15:46 ` yong xue
2008-02-15 18:28 ` Greg KH
2008-02-17 7:53 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-02-13 1:41 ` "ide=reverse" do we still " Rene Herman
2008-02-13 4:44 ` Greg KH
2008-02-13 12:06 ` Rene Herman
2008-02-13 12:16 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-02-13 12:46 ` Rene Herman
2008-02-13 22:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-02-13 12:57 ` Rene Herman
2008-02-14 17:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-02-15 13:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-02-13 2:43 ` Ken Moffat
2008-02-13 4:43 ` Greg KH
2008-02-13 15:32 ` Ken Moffat
2008-02-19 15:08 ` Ken Moffat
2008-02-13 7:54 ` [discuss] " Dirk GOUDERS
2008-02-13 8:26 ` Greg KH
2008-02-13 8:54 ` Dirk GOUDERS
2008-02-13 20:00 ` Dirk GOUDERS
2008-02-13 20:48 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080213093225.GA16985@rhun.haifa.ibm.com \
--to=muli@il.ibm.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®