From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Richard Kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: kernel-doc : possible fix for non-fatal perl errors when parsing some function pointers
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:53:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080215095317.c2ce41d3.rdunlap@xenotime.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080215094437.5f6d7b3b.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:44:37 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:21:54 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:13:12 +0000 Richard Kennedy wrote:
> >
> > > When running "make htmldocs" I'm seeing some non-fatal perl errors
> > > caused by trying to parse the callback function definitions in
> > > blk-core.c.
> > >
> > > The errors are "Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.)..."
> > >
> > > The function pointers are defined without a * i.e.
> > > int (drv_callback)(struct request *)
> > >
> > > The compiler is happy with them, but kernel-doc isn't.
> > >
> > > This patch teaches create_parameterlist in kernel-doc to parse this type
> > > of function pointer definition, but is it the right way to fix the
> > > problem ? The problem only seems to occur in blk-core.c.
> > >
> > > However with the patch applied, kernel-doc finds the correct parameter
> > > description for the callback in blk_end_request_callback, which is
> > > doesn't normally.
> > > (the patch is against v2.6.25-rc1)
> > >
> > > I thought it would be a bit odd to change to code to use the more normal
> > > form of function pointers just to get the documentation to work, so I
> > > fixed kernel-doc instead - even though this is teaching it to understand
> > > code that might go away (The comment for blk_end_request_callback says
> > > that it should not be used and will removed at some point).
> > >
> > > Any ideas on which is the best way to fix this?
> >
> > Hi Richard,
> > Thanks for the patch. I was planning to look into this problem
> > this weekend.
> >
> > I think that changing scripts/kernel-doc to accept the current
> > kernel source tree usage is the right thing to do, even if the
> > block/blk code is a bit different. I'll test it a bit and then
> > push it.
>
> I'm not quite happy with the way that these function pointer
> parameters are presented. E.g.,
> the callback function above is presented by kernel-doc as:
>
> int ()(struct request *) drv_callback);
> whereas this
> int (drv_callback)(struct request *)
> would be much better. If you could look into massaging that
> parameter output, that would be great. If not, I'll look into
> later.
OK, this is a separate issue, so your patch doesn't need to handle/fix
it. I'll check your followup email/patch for whitespace etc....
> > I appreciate the patch.
> >
> > > diff --git a/scripts/kernel-doc b/scripts/kernel-doc
> > > index 26146cb..68b2e4e 100755
> > > --- a/scripts/kernel-doc
> > > +++ b/scripts/kernel-doc
> > > @@ -1512,13 +1512,13 @@ sub create_parameterlist($$$) {
> > > # corresponding data structures "correctly". Catch it later in
> > > # output_* subs.
> > > push_parameter($arg, "", $file);
> > > - } elsif ($arg =~ m/\(.*\*/) {
> > > + } elsif ($arg =~ m/\(.+\)\s*\(/) {
> > > # pointer-to-function
> > > $arg =~ tr/#/,/;
> > > - $arg =~ m/[^\(]+\(\*\s*([^\)]+)\)/;
> > > + $arg =~ m/[^\(]+\(\*?\s*(\w*)\s*\)/;
> > > $param = $1;
> > > $type = $arg;
> > > - $type =~ s/([^\(]+\(\*)$param/$1/;
> > > + $type =~ s/([^\(]+\(\*?)$param/$1/;
> > > push_parameter($param, $type, $file);
> > > } elsif ($arg) {
> > > $arg =~ s/\s*:\s*/:/g;
---
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-15 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-15 17:13 Richard Kennedy
2008-02-15 17:21 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-15 17:42 ` Richard Kennedy
2008-02-15 22:46 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-16 11:02 ` Richard Kennedy
2008-02-15 17:44 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-15 17:53 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2008-02-15 18:14 ` Richard Kennedy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080215095317.c2ce41d3.rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--to=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@rsk.demon.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®