mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, dipankar@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add list_for_each_rcu to features-removal list
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:47:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080216084723.GD9962@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080128122500.GA32723@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 04:25:00AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> The list_for_each_entry_rcu() primitive should be used instead of
> list_for_each_rcu(), as the former is easier to use and provides
> better type safety.  This patch therefore adds list_for_each_rcu()
> to the Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt file (for mid-2008)
> and marks its comment header deprecated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> 
>  Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt |   10 ++++++++++
>  include/linux/list.h                       |    5 ++++-
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.24/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt linux-2.6.24-dep-lfeRCU/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> --- linux-2.6.24/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt	2008-01-24 14:58:37.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.24-dep-lfeRCU/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt	2008-01-28 04:00:49.000000000 -0800
> @@ -333,3 +333,13 @@ Why:	This driver has been marked obsolet
>  Who:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
>  
>  ---------------------------
> +
> +What:	list_for_each_rcu() primitive
> +When:	July 2008
> +Files:	include/linux/list.h
> +Why:	The list_for_each_entry_rcu() primitive should be used instead,
> +	as it is less error-prone and provides better type safety.
> +Who:	Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>...

Declaring something as deprecated doesn't automatically convert the 
in-kernel users.

And once there are no in-kernel users left you can kill it immediately.

The only working way for getting rid of list_for_each_rcu() is:
- send patches for all in-kernel usages to the maintainers of the code
  in question now
- once all of these patches have entered Linus' tree (which might not
  be before the 2.6.26 merge window) you can remove list_for_each_rcu()

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-16  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-28 12:25 Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-16  8:47 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-02-16 16:19   ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-16 16:39     ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080216084723.GD9962@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi \
    --to=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®