From: Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86: coding style fixes arch/x86/lib/csum-wrappers_64.c
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:57:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080217145728.46ecdaa5@paolo-desktop> (raw)
[PATCH 2/2] x86: coding style fixes arch/x86/lib/csum-wrappers_64.c
On top of the previous patch makes the file errors free according to checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by: Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/lib/csum-wrappers_64.c | 9 ++++-----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/csum-wrappers_64.c b/arch/x86/lib/csum-wrappers_64.c
index a8ce791..95e45dc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/csum-wrappers_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/csum-wrappers_64.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ csum_partial_copy_from_user(const void __user *src, void *dst,
{
might_sleep();
*errp = 0;
- if (likely(access_ok(VERIFY_READ,src, len))) {
+ if (likely(access_ok(VERIFY_READ, src, len))) {
/* Why 6, not 7? To handle odd addresses aligned we
would need to do considerable complications to fix the
checksum which is defined as an 16bit accumulator. The
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ csum_partial_copy_from_user(const void __user *src, void *dst,
return isum;
}
*errp = -EFAULT;
- memset(dst,0,len);
+ memset(dst, 0, len);
return isum;
}
@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ csum_partial_copy_to_user(const void *src, void __user *dst,
*errp = 0;
return csum_partial_copy_generic(src, (void __force *)dst, len, isum, NULL, errp);
-
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(csum_partial_copy_to_user);
@@ -111,7 +110,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(csum_partial_copy_to_user);
__wsum
csum_partial_copy_nocheck(const void *src, void *dst, int len, __wsum sum)
{
- return csum_partial_copy_generic(src,dst,len,sum,NULL,NULL);
+ return csum_partial_copy_generic(src, dst, len, sum, NULL, NULL);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(csum_partial_copy_nocheck);
@@ -129,7 +128,7 @@ __sum16 csum_ipv6_magic(const struct in6_addr *saddr,
" adcq 8(%[daddr]),%[sum]\n"
" adcq $0,%[sum]\n"
: [sum] "=r" (sum64)
- : "[sum]" (rest),[saddr] "r" (saddr), [daddr] "r" (daddr));
+ : "[sum]" (rest), [saddr] "r" (saddr), [daddr] "r" (daddr));
return csum_fold((__force __wsum)add32_with_carry(sum64 & 0xffffffff, sum64>>32));
}
--
1.5.4.1.183.gf873
next reply other threads:[~2008-02-17 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-17 13:57 Paolo Ciarrocchi [this message]
2008-02-17 15:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-17 18:31 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080217145728.46ecdaa5@paolo-desktop \
--to=paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®