From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759605AbYBSR53 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:57:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756674AbYBSR5I (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:57:08 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:44546 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755823AbYBSR5G (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:57:06 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:53:39 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Yinghai Lu , Andrew Morton , Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] AMD opteron mm config numa etc Message-ID: <20080219175339.GB8344@kroah.com> References: <200802190319.28699.yinghai.lu@sun.com> <20080219112322.GD7204@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080219112322.GD7204@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:23:22PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > please check some amd opteron related mmconf and numa patches > > > > could make up for system that system have acpi problem or still can > > mmconf and numa when acpi=off > > Greg, any deep objections against these patches? (other than that they > need a good amount of testing) I personally think that the more > independent the kernel is of the whims of the BIOS, the better ... No objection from me, other than they need a LOT of testing. Oh, and the networking patch is still wrong, and the poster has been told this numerous times, which makes me wonder how well the pci bridge patch was tested... thanks, greg k-h