From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755204AbYBYISt (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:18:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753082AbYBYISk (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:18:40 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.13]:33960 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751608AbYBYISj (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:18:39 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:17:52 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Ian Kent Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, autofs@linux.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] autofs4 - implement a miscelaneous device for ioctl control Message-Id: <20080225001752.d154e88b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1203925954.3087.64.camel@raven.themaw.net> References: <1203925954.3087.64.camel@raven.themaw.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org We have four patches, all with the same title - please avoid doing this. I could invent titles for them (as I often have to do), but I think it would be best if you were to do so. That way, we avoid confusion and people who later google for the patch's title to understand the patch's background will get better coverage. So... resend, please? Documentation/SubmittingPatches has some tips on all of this - search term is "Subject:".