From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932146AbYB1ALz (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:11:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761973AbYB1ALd (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:11:33 -0500 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.171.30]:35229 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932083AbYB1ALc (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:11:32 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:11:29 -0600 From: Paul Jackson To: Max Krasnyanskiy Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, oleg@tv-sign.ru, rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] cpuset: system sets Message-Id: <20080227181129.59086769.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <47C5F7D6.2000203@qualcomm.com> References: <20080227222103.673194000@chello.nl> <20080227222542.311184000@chello.nl> <47C5F7D6.2000203@qualcomm.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Max wrote: > Hmm, shouldn't patches be sent inline ? Huh? Peter's patches were inline for me ... odd. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214