From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933608AbYB2Q6u (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:58:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760757AbYB2Q6i (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:58:38 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:37772 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760646AbYB2Q6h (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:58:37 -0500 Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:57:52 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Andrew Morton , Steven Rostedt , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner , john stultz , jarkao2@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix boot-time hangs from PREEMPT_RCU and NO_HZ Message-ID: <20080229165752.GB7952@elte.hu> References: <20080229044329.GA20207@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20080228210140.37abe9cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080229154835.GB27248@elte.hu> <20080229165557.GC13330@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080229165557.GC13330@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 04:48:35PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > Note: This patch came directly from the -rt patch where it has been > > > > tested for several months. > > > > > > > > Andrew, could you please apply this? > > > > > > I already have it, via git-sched. Presumably Ingo has it lined up for > > > the next sched-related merge. > > > > yes. > > Ah, thank you both and sorry for the noise! no, sorry about me taking longer than usual about it - this is not a small patch and it had to be observed a bit longer. But as it is usual with your patches, it's working perfectly :-) Ingo